I am only suggesting an odd known case of later failures from hydrolock not that you experienced the same day failure. I merely suggest this and fatigue as other possible causes in looking at and over the edge of the limits of things. I am generally the first to say "new parts are not always good parts." Glad the block can be saved!
@6.5L you wrote the book on doing something like the BD spool valve because "it couldn't be done." First off: Your money and your engine build so we are along for the ride no matter what.

I wouldn't bother putting a gear set on a 350 or 454, but, I get sick of low mile stretched out chains on the 6.2/6.5 esp with how deeply buried they are in the front to get to. I dread the job Patch needs from both the IP and chain slop making it a fogger on start up in our warm weather. Patch doesn't have that many hard miles on the chain! Gear set in stock ready to go on the moment the 1992 project gets out of the garage.
The moment we put the injection pump on top of the timing set all experience with chains go out the window.
Gas engine experience isn't really relevant to a diesel engine especially this diesel engine. The Chain/Gear to IP drive is a holdover from the same tooling as gas engines Olds diesel hand grenade that generally didn't last long enough to concern GM about chain life. (Design Emissions life 50K and vehicle life was 100K back then. Regardless the Olds Diesel made Lemon laws happen. ) Most running gear drives are Hot Rod or Race engines pushing the ragged edge of destruction vs. the casual 4 wheels and a box that keeps a boring chain if the OEM can't put a life limited timing belt on it. IMO the Rat Rod/Race engines will have more trouble than most because of what they are and being used as such. I suggest "heavy duty gear drive timing diesel engine experience aka Cummins" would be more relevant. They go 1/2 to 1 million miles on the timing gears. Gear rattle at idle from an out of sync CP3 is the only downside. (Factory procedure now on 6.7's to correct this NVH CP3 sync.) I have to break arms and knock heads together to overcome the "we have always done it this way" combined with awesome fear of something new like gapless rings.
6.2/6.5 diesels eat timing chains for breakfast because the high sudden load from the injection event stretches it out. The entire valve train is an irrelevant load vs. the injection pump's peak load, that happens after the injectors pop. The peak load from the IP is what stretches the chain out. The IP that is gear driven off the camshaft - likely only because a cheaper chain couldn't do it. The chains are sloppy garbage at 30K miles with GM just making the limit specs to .8",
that's nearly an inch of slop, just to get by. That 0.8" is from chain stretch
not wear. My 1992 project thread should illustrate what a sloppy timing set does to the valves: it hammers the exhaust valves so bad into submission the tips start fatigue flaking. (
Timing set pics.
Valve stem flaking.) Even the highest quality Cloyes chains are stretched into submission as I found during unexpected low mile tear downs.
If you ever get ahold of a timing scope and watch the timing bounce all over the place with a worn/sloppy chain on a gas engine and then figure the 6.2/6.5 chain is sloppy at 30K miles the extra vibration theory just sinks from being slapped around from chain slop.
The final nail in the coffin for your engine builder's "opinion" must be a lack of experience with a similar "Forgotten Diesel" to ours found in Ford aka the 7.3 IDI's all gear timing set that lack the stretched chain trouble and need to retime the IP often. This is why the Ford DB2 IP's turn backwards from ours:
/Rant