Search results

heres a couple pics of the system we built 2 years ago, no problems up til now with it, we used stainless flexis for the up pipes...

watching your progress.... lends well to running compounds as well, if you go and search our testing of this from 3 years ago you will find all sorts of info...

newer diesels do not use bellows, because they use slip joints to allow for expansion, from experience, the first time a rigid system sees egts over 1000 degrees, it will cause cracking somewhere in the system guaranteed...

take the time and go and read the title of this thread, and i will say it again clearer, no pro40 or super 40 came lower than a 58mm wheel, as far as i am concerned, running the volvo hx 40 with a 56mm wheel and the turbine from the 40 is taking a step backwards, we ran this exact turbo for 2...

http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/BILLET-COMPRESSOR-WHEEL_1063449452.html Here is one of probably many different possibilities for the manufacturer.....

actually the size of the shaft is neither of these, its a 6mm shaft.... this is funny beyond belief, this is what happens when something is pushed before there is actual factual documentation and testing, imagine his profit margin for selling 200 wheels between 2 forums..... i hope for the sake...

no hx 40 came with a wheel below 58mm, we ran the same turbo as that one with a cranked .310" IP, anything under 1700 rpm was smokey and laggy with the 16cm2, although we work with our truck... maybe for someone with a play toy it might be good.... keep in mind the guys running the cko40w are...

so you think that your fancy china wheel slows down the overall speed that the charger will spin? like i said on DP trying to push more air through a charger without MWE is just asking for surge and shaft failure.... but i digress, you are the self proclaimed 6.5l diesel specialist, at least...

so we should just disregard the fact that when the 5.9l actuates the gate on the turbo that 3 cylinders are gated leaving only the drive pressure from three cylinders to drive the charger, where as the 6.5l still drives the charger with all 8 even when its gating? from what i have found the...

do you even have a clue what a 5.9l puts out stock? in 89-93 the were rated at 175, then 93-94.5 rated between 175 and 215, after that i believe m from 95-2000 they were around 215-245, and then climbing exponentially... my point being that 6.5l is a bigger air pump with more volume, so it can...

oh its okay though, we dont spin the CKO's nearly as hard as the cummins guys do so its okay, :rolleyes5: even though our air pump is bigger than theirs....LOL

i would be more worried for the CHRA itself exploding, a 6MM shaft already being over spun, add to that a higher flowing wheel and its going to snap the shaft and send wheel chunks into the engine, but at least its only a customers truck and not something tested first on your own rig...LOL...

we would be more than happy to share all that info, in comparison format, with the same turbos on a GM sidemount. Including wheel sizes(both compressor and turbine) housing sizes and fueling rates, along with pics and vids. However, info sharing is a 2 way street..... you take an ATT, pop off...

The data collected is probably spread over three or four different threads on Diesel Place. Never took the time as of yet to complile it all in one thread. We have now tested and compiled data for three different singles, and four compound combinations. All with the same fuel settings, some were...

of course we did, the compounds are an after thought, go and read the thread on dieselplace, all the answers you seek are there....

:popcorn::popcorn:

:popcorn::popcorn:

the 3.8 use an m-90, need 2 to be enough air... guys with the 6.9l ford have tried them single, and then took them off...

the 112 is too small IMO, we have a m-122 from a cobra here that we will try someday, bought it brand new take off from ebay...

We are in agreement that with normal drivetrain losses, it would be in the range of 275-300bhp. Which is a very good improvement over the original 195-215 bhp. Just like to be specific as to whether someone is talking about crank or wheel horsepower, as there have been many unsubstantiated...