It was the solenoid. I could pop it with a screwdriver and get vacuum at the turbo but it would not cycle vacuum but only a few seconds. Tried the WD40 trick to no avail. Bought a new one yesterday and it works again.
How much low end throttle response do I lose with the ATT? I like the sound of everything about it but the turbo lag. Is there another turbo out there that has better low end and maybe not as much on the top?
Now that I have fixed my slippage in my trans, I'm confident that was some of the contribution to felt lag, now I'd say the lag is nil & you would not miss a thing, if there is a better turbo I've not seen any substantive/documented reporting on it.
Holsets do good job, but make so much more boost PSI wise, that to be safe you need to lower the CR of the engine. Beauty of the ATT for me anyway is that it's operating envelope is same as what GM turbos are, so it's a bolt on instal, better everything, there are about 16 or 17 of them out running now, no complaints that I've seen with lag other than my initial results, which after the trans overhaul I just did, I'm backing away from.
There is some lag (very slight) as you do get a bIgger plume of black at first spool up (clears fast, & truck is crisply accelerating) when I was with the gm turbo, but that only occurs if I stomp it; with normal acceleration I have no discernable change in the exhaust plume, if you lok at data in other thread you almost have a 1:1 ratio boost to drive pressure, which is what you really want to see in a turbo. My Burb is next one to get one, probalby gonna happen next week, before I go on vacation to Va. if I get one missing fitting I need.
Before I hijack it any more we probably should be discussing this in the replacement turbo thread.
Glad to see it was the WG solenoid that fixed it for you. "We love it when a plan comes together" Jim where is that pic of Hannibal Smith when you need it?
