Ooh, it's 0.4mm smaller than 57mm diameter? Perhaps the size listing is rounded up/down to the nearest mm? More importantly, who freaking cares!?!?
The error in needle width and the increment markings on the dial, combined with viewing angle, can easily be 50-75 RPM off from the actual engine speed, anyway! The tachometer on the 6.5's was mainly just to let you know if you were getting dangerously close/over the redline for the engine. It was NEVER intended to be dead on to the revolution accurate - if it was the input for it would have been taken off of the CPS output, NOT off of the alternator - not to mention that the tach display would have been designed much differently! I can NOT understand your almost OCD fixation on having such a dead accurate stock tachometer reading with what is not that precise of a factory dash gauge that has built in inaccuracy in its very design - needle width, face diameter, partial sweep, marking widths, increment spacing, etc.
You want dead-on accurate RPM readings? Then 1) Buy a Stewart Warner, AutoMeter or other high quality aftermarket large face (5" or larger), 270° (or greater) sweep electronic Racing Tachometer, OR a digital tachometer, AND 2) Then find a way to send an input signal from the CPS to drive it. The factory dash tachometer on the 6.5 (or gasser) was NEVER made or intended to be as accurate as you're try to get this one to be. If any part of the needle is touching any part of the increment marking for the RPM you calculate you should be running, consider it good and you've got the tachometer dialed in as accurate as its ever going to get.