Top Dead Center Offset, a negative number, seems a strange concept, as why would anyone design a system where advanced IP timing would result in better performance, then arbitrarily let PCM take away, or retard, some of that advance?
(+) means advance, (-) means retard in timing numbers
It would seem to engender the theory that if some is good, more is better - "ain't no engineers gonna slow me down!"
Ain't 'zactly what happens, folks
When the fuel is turned up in the mechanical DB2, you don't just get more fuel at WOT, you also get more fuel at idle - also tends to make the throttle more sensitive - then, because the window for the injection event becomes narrower as rpm increases and the mechanical injection systems can only allow a limited range of advance, those systems are limited to the lower rpm ranges - and, as we all know, torque is low-rpm power, horsepower is hi-rpm power: more combustion events per unit of time = more BTU = more power - that's how you get 1500hp out of a 2Litre engine at 20,000rpm
Same happens with the electronic versions, butcept we got TDCO, which not only compensates to retain oem throttle sensitivity, but also compensates thruout the rpm range as the window for the injection event becomes increasingly narrower as rpm increases - it is used there to decrease the timing required for the pumping event, in order to get the relatively slow-moving fuel up to pressure and into the chamber in time for the combustion event - the DS4 is still a mechanical pump, like the DB2, but with advantage of electronic control - TDCO adds an offset delay to the 512 hi-res timing count such that the pumping plunger rollers are further up the ramps as pumping\injection-event timing begins, creating higher pressure at that point so that injection pressure is attained sooner, getting the fuel into the cylinder sooner so the injection event and combustion event can occur within the available window - no possible way to do any of that with the DB2
Thats the beauty of letting a computer handle the chores - PCM thinks at 12 million cycles per second at 650rpm or 6000rpm - rpm is based on 60 second time period, so divide that by 60 and the number of cylinders firing per crank rotation to find how many injections are required per second, then compare that to 12mhz - PCM is just a tad quicker, if my dyslexic calculations are correct
Note: there is a method of mechanically turning up the DS4, called "the Bump", "Optic Bump", and etc - it is accomplished by advancing the mechanical position of the Optic Sensor on the camring, resulting in similar performance to advancing timing and doing TDCO LEARN - PCM doesn't know about the advanced position, so fuel rate is increased, advance is increased, performance increases - butcept, because PCM doesn't know about this little trick, an unwanted result is the accompanying increase in throttle sensitivity, to which some drivers cannot become accustomed